I applied for a job and I talked to my parents this evening. And I watched the Twins lose a heartbreaker (all credit to Jackson Chourio though, wow).

Can't believe my reward for this is that I have to go to bed soon so I can go to work in the morning!

Fame awaits

Apr. 2nd, 2025 09:52 pm

I emailed a baseball podcast about a linguistics thing and they read out my email!

I mean they read it on one of the mailbag episodes where all they do is read out emails. But still! I wrote it a while ago and had forgotten about it since, so it was fun.

At the end, one of the hosts said "whatever degree you got, hang that sucker on the wall with pride, man, because that makes a lot of sense." Super cute.

The next email was from a woodworker, who wants to make them an official piece of wood to knock on, because one of the hosts is someone who's always saying "knock on wood."

And this juxtaposition meant that they commented on how impressively diverse their patreons are, anything that comes up they can get an expert opinion on or "find someone that has devoted their life to this topic."

Watching the Twins lose again (I missed the Opening Day game with a migraine, but this one hasn't been much less depressing).

As I have mentioned, I accidentally made a baseball fan of [personal profile] diffrentcolours. (Accidental because all the other English dudes I've dated either hated all sportsball or hated everything USian so I wasn't expecting him to take an interest but it turns out he's the right kind of nerd for sabermetrics to appeal to.)

This afternoon, I introduced him to the concept of Remembering Some Guys (since the Opening Day PR always involves a lot of it; the Twins start in St. Louis so I read names like Jason Isringhausen or Scott Rolen) and used as evidence the thread on here a while ago where everyone listed the mediocre players they loved when they were ten or whatever. He asked me mine (probably Gary Gaetti), and then he said "Mine would be Jake Cave!"

It would. I'm so delighted. He's only been a fan for a few years and yet he totally gets this and has his own Guys already!

He also just told me he misses Sanó and Astudillo. Aww. I do too. And those Guys are perfect for Remembering.

I'm so proud.

It's good to know that Paul Skenes (amazing professional baseball pitcher) and I (none of those things) have one thing in common:

We can't play video games.

(This is especially funny because he is being interviewed because he's the cover boy on this year's version of the Major League Baseball video game. Which I probably could play, if the text can go big enough.)

We're both in search of a hobby actually.

Conservatives think "diversity" is nonsense and progressives might think it's at best a nice-to-have if there's a budget for it once all the "real" stuff has been sorted out.

But it's not nonsense and it's not just for warm fuzzy feelings! It keeps you from writing "tits" in Spanish on a lot of hats that you then can't sell and everyone laughs at you.

I really didn't expect my gender would end up being so thoroughly Midwestern Dad, but here I am relaxing after a busy week at work by drinking a beer and yelling at the sportsball on TV.

The British coverage of MLB is a little better now (there is some play-by-play!), still annoying and weird, but then the official commentary probably is too heh.

I've had a fun and surprisingly chill evening (D is out and I worried that Gary would squeak forever but he took himself to bed early and has been an angel; every time I yell too loud he looks up like "are you okay? can I assist?" and I have to reassure him and tell him to go back to sleep) watching some Game 1s of the division series: Tigers @ Guardians and now Mets @ Phillies.

One of the things we ask of baseball is, not to dissociate us from the real world or spare us from it, but to give us a break from the otherwise unrelenting awareness of the gap between how the world is and how we want it to be.

So begins what is possibly my favorite piece of baseball writing this year.

Like a lot of us probably, I've been ruminating a lot lately -- as the U.S. election nears, as the days grow darker and colder, as big and small stresses loom -- on the gap between how the world is and how I want it to be.

Baseball is never worse, though, than when it's shoving that gap right into our faces, making it even more stark and obvious and excruciating than it is while we navigate the rest of our day. Right now, Twins baseball is baseball at its very worst.

So in March I said, about cancelling my autorenewal on the MLB TV subscription, "I'm sure I'll go back to it. I don't think a year without watching or listening to baseball will do my (currently already shitty) mental health any good. But I just need to have a lot of feelings first." But after a half-hearted attempt in May had met with the slightest resistance, I never even regretted it again.

It wasn't quite the dreary year of MLB that I'd predicted -- I worried about the superteams, the boringest kind of teams, coming back in the Dodgers and the Yankees, and while the Yankees were certainly way less fun than last year (when they were briefly below .500 for the first time this millennium and their fans acted like the world was ending), the Dodgers are continuing their inability to keep pitchers healthy and there will be no 100-win teams this season. Of course I'd like to think that with no team winning that many, there's no team that needs to lose that many either -- but the poor White Sox had to show me how far from true that is by being literally the worst team in anything we'd recognize as baseball as she is played today. (That they lost to the Tigers, who went from having barely-more-likelihood of going to the playoffs than those pale hose a month ago, to clinching on that night they beat the White Sox for that record number of losses, is a hell of a thing; it's wild having the Twins be the most boring team in the AL Central this year!).

If that last paragraph didn't make any sense to you, don't worry. The tl;dr is that I ended up feeling pretty justified in saving $150 on not paying for a depressing subscription I wouldn't have gotten much use out of.

Hey I was just showing solidarity with the Twins fans in Minnesota who also couldn't watch the games on TV! That was another really dreary part of this baseball season. The most recent episode of Twins podcast Gleeman and the Geek that I listened to this morning featured the eponymous host saying that they'd had a lot of e-mails from people telling them that this podcast was the only way they'd followed the Twins all year, and I am, no exaggeration, among those. And actually that's felt okay, that has been enough.

Back to the perfect baseball article:

In a way, the Twins are already in the playoffs. You can rebel against the impulse toward despair and rage and resentment, if you want, and embrace the fact that everything we really want out of the postseason is already coming to Target Field over the next few days--at bargain-basement prices, to boot.

What makes the playoffs worth pursuing? Why are they the objective of every fan base and every player? ...It's the raising of the stakes of the game that changes it. It's the brightness of the lights and the national attention and the desperation that makes its way onto the field.... Everything matters. In life, hardly anything feels better than knowing you're doing or witnessing something authentically important, and whereas regular-season baseball is always of negotiable importance, the playoffs matter.

All that vividity and nerve-jangling danger is here. The Twins are a daily story everywhere that baseball is discussed, and they'll play on national TV this Saturday against the Orioles. All that's missing is the bunting on the railings.

(This is where my heart breaks, because this was written on Wednesday and this is Saturday and the Twins already lost that first game against the Orioles which means they are officially out of playoff contention. That takes all the sparkle out of the weekend's games, I probably wouldn't watch them if I could, because it's like watching the last month of Obama being president: our guy(s) can't do much and things are only going to get worse from here.)

But the point still stands! What makes the playoffs fun is that they're meaningful, tense, higher-stakes and widely witnessed. I think this phenomenon will be if anything more familiar to my friends who are soccer-football fans, of teams in leagues that have promotion and relegation. Because people don't just talk about and care about who wins; there is due concern given to the bottom of the league table in a way they wouldn't without relegation.

Last winter, Netflix announced they were doing a documentary following the Boston Red Sox during this season, and hosts of the MLB podcast I listen to were a little bit scornful of this: the Red Sox aren't even that good! Whereas I was intrigued and -- they've had an interesting year, just missing the postseason themselves but even if they hadn't -- I'm more likely to watch that than about, I dunno, the Dodgers season this year.

Success gives worse advice than failure because success doesn't know what worked and doesn't have to think about it that much. Maybe another way of saying this is that happy teams are alike -- (almost) everything is gong like it should! -- but each unhappy team is unhappy in its own way. I can't wait to hear about how the Red Sox are unhappy because I do not know!

Back to the article, which does such a great job of articulating who I think is most at fault with the Twins' 2024 season.

The Pohlad family [owners of the Minnesota Twins] has so methodically demoralized their customer base, there's one other vital, joyous ingredient of playoff baseball missing: the crowd.... In the world I want, we could all melt together into this moment, and Target Field [their home ballpark in Minneapolis] would be full all week, because the Twins have earned this quintet of de facto playoff games--for worse, with this month-plus of harrowing collapse, but also for better, with a summer of tremendous baseball.

The untouchable, disinterested owners of the team have set up everyone below them in the chain of command to fail, and as a result, watching even this quasi-playoff week of baseball isn't off to a fun start. In the world I want, the Pohlads would realize that this is all their fault and try hard to ameliorate the problem in the future. In the world we have, a lot of irrevocable damage is already done, and the mountainous beds of money on which that family luxuriates make them partially unaware of and wholly indifferent to the ways they're making the world worse--including this way.

The list of MLB owners who need to sell their teams into public ownership may encompass all of them if you ask me, but there's no doubt that first on that list is John Fisher who has ripped a team away from Oakland to an uncertain future and no fixed address just because he, inheritor of the Gap fortune, thinks his underpants-gnome level plan will make him some more money.

This has been known and remarked upon for the years that Fisher has been indicating that he doesn't care about Oakland and was happy to move the team even with no idea about what that move would actually entail. So for a long time now, people have been reading him for filth. I'm still thinking about something Joe Sheehan said most of a year ago:

The thing about great wealth is that it allows you to define your own life. The destitute, the poor, the great mass in the middle, even people of moderate or considerable success are all, to one degree or another, dependent upon others. I’ve made a nice little career, and the list of people to whom I’m indebted runs deep into three figures. I’ve been knocked around by industry trends and bad luck and outright malice. I have not had complete control, and I doubt very many of you reading this have, either.

The wealthy, though, the .01%, they can chart their path as they wish, their deep reserves serving as both a battering ram to success and a cushion against failure.

As the final season at the Oakland Coliseum drew to a close this Thursday afternoon (note that the writer starts one paragraph: Thursday felt like a playoff game at 1.5x strength; it's not the standings that make a playoff game, it's the vibe!), if MLB fans have learned anything from Oakland in the past few years, it's that owners add nothing to a team and the teams belong to their fans and their cities (or in the case of the Twins a 4- or 5-state area that falls in to the gravity well of Minneapolis/St. Paul) and we deserve better.

Facebook ads in "actually being useful" again! Well eventually: this one I first got last weekend when I was away for work, from "MLB in Europe" (an entity I have never heard of before) advertising a live game on Sunday night (here, Sunday afternoon where it was being playing) that could be watched on BBC iPlayer.

I couldn't watch it -- my hotel room had regular TV, but no streaming services like iPlayer -- but I wasn't that bothered anyway as it was Red Sox/Yankees which is both boring ("the league's greatest rivalry," or something, according to the ad: yawn) and likely depressing (I hate the Yankees! and I hate that they're good again!).

But the other day I got another ad for this Sunday's game: Tigers/Orioles. This is much more interesting to me and more fun teams to watch. And D and I were both in the same place again, yay.

So he put it on as I was finishing up dinner (the handle on the oven fell off so today I learned I can open the oven by prying my fingertips around the edges of the door, which is good because otherwise our dinner would have been imprisoned!) and it ended up being quite the experience!

It's geared to a British audience, so one of the first things I noticed when I came into the living room was someone North American-sounding explaining what a shortstop does and why Gunnar Henderson is an unusual one to a British-accented person who didn't know any of this. That's fine, that makes sense. MLB is forever trying to "break in to Europe" by which they primarily seem to mean the UK -- there's been one series a year in London at the beginning of the season for the past few years -- so okay you have to explain these things.

But they were doing it in an extremely strange way that I eventually realized was like all color commentary and no play-by-play.

These are the two genders of baseball (and many other sports, though they go by different names) commentary: someone tells you fairly detailed things about who does what as it happens, and someone offers wider context, bigger picture and/or tangential thoughts.

Which was surprisingly difficult for me to cope with -- okay maybe I shouldn't have been surprised, because of course even when I'm watching TV I'm relying on the people telling me what's happening. When I see a game in person, I miss the majority of it if I don't have a radio with me!

But I was confused. Not just by the absence of play-by-play commentary, but also by the overabundance of color commentary. It's like asking someone for directions and they sing you a song about where you want to go. Even if it's a nice song, after a while you realize you're still no closer to getting there.

And I don't even think it was a very good song, heh. By the end of the game, I'd determined that I just have high standards for how to explain baseball to people who don't know it because I've spent the last couple of years doing that for D.

I concluded that these people all needed British boyfriends to practice their commentating skills on for a couple years first, because I never would've tried to explain the pick-off rule change -- well, I almost certainly wouldn't have explained it at all, because that's not 101-level stuff; I'd maybe explain the rule as it currently is if it became relevant (it did not) but I wouldn't say "it changed" without saying why or what it had changed from and my explanation wouldn't end with "because them he'd had the greenlight"! Because that's just more jargon, I would not trust that its meaning would be clear at all. Similarly, the other person said something about how the Orioles had been active in signing new players last offseason, which again seems a bit arcane and irrelevant but, uh, okay! But as evidence for this I would not offer "they got a Cy Young winner" and then not even saying what "a Cy Young" is or why you'd want someone who'd won one!

It was all that kind of random. They had a "bingo card" of stuff they're looking forward to happening, and it had, like, "Eutaw Street home run" (a thing so rare that when it happens a plaque gets put down but it also had "a curveball strike out" (a thing so ordinary it happened in the first inning and the British person didn't even know it had happened when it did!).

They encouraged the British audience to tweet in their questions. I had so many questions. But none of them were the kind they took on the air: "what is a balk?" (famously complicated and also very rare and also it doesn't really matter) and "can a batter switch the side of the plate they're swinging from in one at-bat" (which is the kind of edge-case D has been asking me about all along, I love questions like this!).

Eventually D took pity on me (or got sick of me asking questions like "What inning is it?" "Who hit that home run?", incredibly basic things that I've had a much better idea of in every other baseball broadcast I've listened to. Which was a sweet little bit of access intimacy.

He's very good these days! I did have to teach him the tricky nuance of "oh and two" (the count: no balls and two strikes) versus "oh for two" (a player's performance so far in the game: no hits in two at-bats) but only because I knew he'd like to know, not to be pedantic or anything.

And the Tigers won, which is what I'd been cheering for. So, this was a fun way to spend an evening! If weirdly exhausting.

Good day

Sep. 10th, 2024 11:13 pm

After work, diffrentcolours and I went in to town to get me some posh shoes to wear this weekend (I asked about the dress code and was basically told "err on the side of too smart," sigh, so I really did need new shoes).

It went surprisingly quickly, so I had time/energy for a stretch goal which was solving the backpack problem, which I did not fix with a backpack but with a man bag which D spotted as looking cute and clearly like a UK handbag/U.S. purse but for guys too insecure to carry anything that doesn't look manly.

We even have time for a pint on the way back to the train station. It was chilly but sunny with a few fluffy clouds in the sky which were turning pink and golden in the sun that was setting far too early for my tastes (it was dark on my way home yesterday from the gym and I was Big Mad about this; I am not ready for winter to be encroaching!).

Tonight he started playing one of his free-this-month PlayStation games, which is a baseball one that accurately replicates the current season. It was really fun to watch him play a game, as the Minnesota Twins of course, and win 7-0 against the team that won last year's World Series. Something I would not expect of the real-life Twins now! (So many good players are out injured that just hearing their names again gave me a wave of nostalgia, and they currently are doing incredibly badly, at a point in the season where it's especially important for them to not do that.)

He had a great time, and I realized how bad I am at explaining breaking pitches, and I also had a great time watching him have a great time.

Like most things about the U.S. Republican party, this article about the intensity with which the congressional party are approaching the upcoming baseball gameagainst their Democrat counterparts is as weirdly fascinating as it is depressing.

After a litany of Republican failures this Congress (can't impeach Biden, can't antagonize his son effectively, can't correctly count their votes about the impeachment of the Secretary of Homeland Security, their committees are just blocking bills from reaching the House floor...) the article says:

As if stealing advice from the 12-step program, Republicans are now only seeking to control the things they can control. And Democrats are fully aware that means the GOP is gunning for them at Nationals Park on Wednesday.

The Republican practice sessions have been intense and very early in the mornings. The Democrats are much more laid-back about theirs.

The Republicans taking part also seem much more intense. Their coach, Rep. Roger Williams, says:

“It’s a big rivalry. Everybody says [the game is] bipartisan; it’s not really bipartisan. And with all the stuff that’s happening, this is another way to get after each other.”

"It's not really bipartisan" is the Republicans' approach to governing as well as the baseball game. Another quote from him seems equally revealing of wider patterns:

“I tell people, go back to your high school days, when you played your biggest rivalry in football. All you thought about was that, right? At school, you didn’t do your homework, you didn’t study. You’re ready to get out there.”

Republicans certainly haven't been "doing their homework," and do seem to have gone to schools like mine, where sports were the priority and excuses would always be made for the athletes who most successfully propagated their toxic masculinity.

Meanwhile, on the other side:

“They’re definitely a lot better at baseball than they are at governing,” says Rep. Jared Huffman, a former player who’s now the Democrats’ first-base coach. (Huffman said he gave up playing because the early morning practices were too much.)

Anyway, even if you don't care about baseball or U.S. politics, here's a couple of sentences that made me laugh and I hope you like them too.

In the past, opposition researchers have been dispatched to the game to get footage of certain candidates wearing baseball pants. (It’s almost impossible for anyone over the age of 40 to look good in baseball pants; it’s actually impossible to look good in baseball pants if you’ve authored a bill that has become a law.)

I still haven't gotten an MLB TV subscription for this year.

I didn't expect to go this long without it. (It's worrying evidence of an anhedonia pattern that I'm observing but seem powerless to do anything about.) But then, the Twins made that extra-easy for a while by being terrible. They started, like...7-13 I think? With a dispiriting set of players lost to injuries.

But then they won a few games. I commented that it was embarrassing to see their social media so happy about beating teams like the White Sox and Angels. Terrible teams did account for a lot of the winning streak. But not all of it!

Yesterday I saw the streak was up to 12 games. I also thought it might be nice to actually watch some baseball on this sunny long weekend full of dad stuff (drinking lager, cleaning the patio...).

So I actually started to try to buy the subscription. Which involved finding out the Twins were losing 7-1. Against the Red Sox. In the eighth inning. (They ended up losing that game 9-2... or, as I saw Twins Daily typo it, 92- . It might well feel like they've lost ninety-two to not-even-zero since it means the end of a reasonably long winning streak!)

I still don't have the subscription.

Not because my team was losing. But because I thought my card information was saved and it wasn't and going to get my card from the next room and type in all that shit on my phone seemed like way too much work.

I canceled the automatic renewal of my MLB TV subscription a month or two ago.

I'm sure I'll go back to it. I don't think a year without watching or listening to baseball will do my (currently already shitty) mental health any good. But I just need to have a lot of feelings first.

tl;dr: billionaires ruin everything )

I've long said that on Manchester's derby day, when its two big football teams play each other, my queer/disabled/etc friends and I have to warn each other to stay home, the city centre and lots of other places aren't safe to go when ALL the drunken hegemonic football fans are out at once.

But I'm gonna have to start being more specific. Today City Women are hosting United Women, and I didn't even know it was a derby until I left Etihad after my gym class.

So. "On men's derby day..."

For another example of how differently women's sports is treated:

At the gym, when our trainer asked if we were going to watch the match, I said I was sad there was no more Six Nations to watch, and another person said "Women's Six Nations starts today!"

"Can I watch it on TV?" I asked (not rhetorically or anything!).

"Ah, that I don't know," she said.

I can. But in a much more haphazard and "channel schedule subject to change" way than the men's tournament would ever have to tolerate. But I watched the Wales v Scotland match this afternoon and it was so good even though it was so heartbreaking to watch Wales get that close and then not be able to win, at home and everything.

...in this article about snowshoe softball.

  • In the headline "- that is not a typo."

What would be the typo? "Snowshoes"? What's it a typo for?

  • Wisconsin

Of course it's Wisconsin.

  • But then, halfway to first, it happens: The batter trips up over his snowshoes and falls face-first into a pile of sawdust. The dust gets everywhere -- into his mouth, up his nose, inside his shirt. He crawls the rest of the way to first, smacks the bag with his right hand and laughs until he can't breathe.

  • Well, in the 1960s, town chairman Ray Sloan had an extremely wacky, very simple and possibly brilliant idea for warm-weather snowshoe baseball: Just pour a bunch of sawdust on the local ball field.

  • "It's a lot more entertaining [with the snowshoes]," - much funnier with the square brackets

  • "Guys would dive headfirst and then their feet would come up and the tails of the snowshoe would come forward and hit them on the head," Punches tells me. - this is two laughs, one for the mental image of what's being described and one for the fact that this is being said by a guy whose surname is Punches. His whole name is Cole Punches, which is way too close to Hole Punches for him to have had a good time at school.

  • "The first-timers have a rough time, they wanna run too fast with [the snowshoes]. You tangle up and you fall down, and that's exactly what the people wanna see. Someone's gonna fall."

  • "Just flopping around, trying to run, and once you start losing your balance, there's no way to regain it. You're gonna go down. The flailing, shoes and arms flailing, and eventually you eat sawdust."

  • The hardest part is that outfielders can't just spin around on a fly ball hit over their heads. Punches says you have to do more of a "three-point turn" with your shoes and by the time you've done that, you've either fallen on your face or the ball is way past you.

  • The other reason the people come? "Pies, the pies are almost as big as snowshoe baseball," Punches says. "They come for the pies and stay for snowshoe baseball."

When I first learned, right as the World Series was finishing, that Dick Bremer was no longer going to be doing TV commentary for the Minnesota Twins now that this season had finished, my first thought was oh no, he's got some awful health problem.

I thought this because he's in his 70s. But also because it had never occurred to me that anything short of his death would get him away from that microphone.

To call him an institution seems to put it too mildly. He had just completed his fortieth year doing Twins play-by-play. I can't imagine Twins games sounding like anyone else because he started this when I was one year old. He started in the second year that the Metrodome existed.

By the way he seems fine, health-wise. The truth turns out to be more and less sad: I'm glad he's physically okay, but every impression I've gotten of him is that he's the kind of person who will be sad he didn't quite manage to call 5,000 games (he called 4,972!), that he didn't get a send-off...he might not have wanted a lot of attention but I'm sure he'd have wanted to know when he had gone to his last Spring Training, called his last Opening Day and his last home game in Minneapolis and his last game... Maybe he did know by that last game, but if he did he couldn't tell anyone and that also sounds awful.

I listen to a Twins podcast done by two local (to Minnesota!) sports writers who cover the Twins. I have, once or twice, paid extra to get their bonus episodes on Patreon -- like when Correa signed, it was worth the price of admission for just how giddy John Bonnes sounded -- and when they mentioned having gone into more detail about Bremer there, I signed up again just to hear it.

And it was nice to hear from the only people I'm likely to hear from about how weird it makes me feel to imagine Twins games without him. But it was also surprisingly touching and insightful at the end, thanks again to John Bonnes.

He said:

All of the accolades coming out yesterday are certainly deserved.

I think baseball does lend itself more towards the connection to announcers than any other sport. There is so much space to fill. And that space is often conversational, it's often that with which we connect.

(Gleeman says "Yeah, it's like a feeling of: I'm gonna spend the evening with Dick Bremer and Justin Morneau, watching the Twins."

Bonnes agrees, "Exactly right," and goes on.)

And so, how much of that is rational vs. emotional vs. whatever, something that's ingrained in our DNA, I'm not sure. But finding someone that you want to spend every evening with [laughs] - three hours! - is no easy trick! And over forty years!

Bremer had, not just the discipline and skill to be able to call that, but also showed enough genuine interest in that which you're watching, in the state in which he lived - every small town that was ever mentioned on that broadcast...! And so there's the 'he's one of us' aspect that's going to be really tough to replace. I mean that in a good way, I don't mean that in a cynical way. That's something that any market probably appreciates.

And then on top of that you don't want to spend three hours with somebody that's grating or inauthentic or...is afraid to reveal some of themselves to you. And the part they reveal to you, you admire, or you appreciate, or you tolerate [chuckles] in some cases.

There is, beyond just the skill of announcing, there is a validation of a person's character and personality that goes along with the forty-year run when you've got to talk into a mike for three and a half hours, a hundred and sixty-two times a year! Plus spring training. Plus postseason. Plus everything else!

He has checked all of the boxes. He has an endless amount of energy and enthusiasm for baseball and for this community. And now he's got a lot more time. And I'm interested to see where that gets directed to. I expect it will be in ways that I will admire and also appreciate.

I had never consciously considered it in this way, but I love the idea of baseball commentators having to reveal something of themselves to their audience in order to do their job well.

And there's something about just how much time you spend with them -- I don't watch anywhere near all 162 games in any baseball season (never mind a Twins season, ha! 62 might be a stretch sometimes!) but this had me wondering about the uncountable hours I spent listening to Dick Bremer over my lifetime. Have I spent that much time with any of my partners? Is it only more for my parents? Realizing that he's in that kind of company makes more sense of how affected -- oddly affected, I wanted to say at first, but no -- I was at the news of Bremer's departure.

I have no particular connection with Oakland, so it's been a little surprising how emotional I've gotten over the prospect of them losing their baseball team to greed and selfishness. (Even as I appreciate they got their baseball team due to owners' greed and selfishness in the first place! Minnesota only has a baseball team because it used to be owned by a big racist who didn't like playing in our nation's capital because he was so racist! (he literally said “I’ll tell you why we came to Minnesota. It was when I found out you only had 15,000 Blacks here”) but I didn't know that until a couple years ago, long after I was a fan of the team and so I feel bad for Oakland fans; there is no ethical consumption under MLB.)

But I read a Joe Sheehan piece today that explains it so well even friends who don't care about baseball can appreciate this. He contrasts the A's John Fisher with Peter Seidler, who owned the San Diego Padres, recently died, and has had warm things said about him in all quarters.
The biggest accomplishment of John Fisher’s life was the moment of his birth, to the co-founders of The Gap. He went to Phillips Exeter and Princeton and Stanford, and then became president of a family investment company. He bought a piece of the Giants with family money, and he later bought the A’s alongside Lew Wolff. The next dime he earns that isn’t in some way related to his surname will be his first. Gaining sole ownership of the A’s in 2016, Fisher proceeded to run the team down in an effort to extort a publicly-funded mallpark and real-estate boondoggle from Oakland. Having only gotten commitments for $425 million in funding and $500 million in reimbursements to that end, Fisher worked out a deal for less than half of that in Nevada. Thank goodness for rich parents.

It’s been a lot worse for me than for you.

The thing about great wealth is that it allows you to define your own life. The destitute, the poor, the great mass in the middle, even people of moderate or considerable success are all, to one degree or another, dependent upon others. I’ve made a nice little career, and the list people to whom I’m indebted runs deep into three figures. I’ve been knocked around by industry trends and bad luck and outright malice. I have not had complete control, and I doubt very many of you reading this have, either.

The wealthy, though, the .01%, they can chart their path as they wish, their deep reserves serving as both a battering ram to success and a cushion against failure. With the sort of wealth people like Seidler and Fisher are born into, you can do anything you want with your life, and in doing so, you can determine how people regard you. The people who own baseball teams are all in this group, and for any one of them to say to a fan “It’s been a lot worse for me than for you” isn’t just insulting, it’s barely human.

Peter Seidler and John Fisher were both born on third base. One decided to steal home, and the other decided to just steal.
And it turns out that even this vote -- as depressing as it is inevitable, from 29 rich guys/conglomerates to let one of their own make even more money -- doesn't make the team moving to Las Vegas a done deal. The fact that two of the three hurdles to it happening are thanks to a group called Schools Not Stadiums is indicative of which of those things I think tax money should pay for. Here's hoping.

I was pretty tired today -- not as bad as yesterday, but I was so fatigued that it actually hurt to get up to serve dinner. I looked forward to an early night snuggled up with Gary by 9pm or so.

But then D wanted to watch the first Twins/Blue Jays game with me, and asked when the second one started and it was 9:30 local time, and now it's 12:30 and I just watched Sonny Gray pick Vladdy Jr. off second base in the most amazing way -- I yelled so loud I woke up the dog -- and now it's 11:30 and there's no way I'll feel any less tired at work tomorrow is there.

And I'm not even going to care. How often do I get to see the Twins win a playoff game?

had two beers and it's way past my bedtime so of course that's when then D bought Out Of The Park 24.

So I've been explaining so many things. For all I feel like I've told D a billion things about baseball,I've taken a pretty light touch to his education, mostly sticking to narratively-interesting things as they come up. So...there's a lot of gaps.

Like "what does 'bullpen' mean" and "what's a pull hitter" and he just mentioned that someone is "Rule 5 draft-eligible" and I'm like oh god.

Like I've heard those words in that order on sports podcasts/radio for years, and yet do I know wtf that really means no I do not.

I'm having so much fun and all we've done is look at tables full of dense information. We haven't even gotten near to "playing" a "game" yet.

I love this.

I hope D is okay. He also had two beers and was way tireder than I was to start with.

Holy shit, I'm reading a baseball newsletter I love, this edition full of silly questions like "What if two players on the same team who look similar, but one is fine (Hunter Renfroe) and one is maybe the best player of his generation (Mike Trout), pretended to be each other?" and "look at this guy making what's always a difficult throw with his wrong hand!"

And sandwiched between such fun nonsense, I was intrigued by this question because I'm also a fan of a meh team that'll likely just miss the playoffs:

I'm a Cubs fan, and this has been a particularly odd season (read: it sucks) for me from an emotional perspective.

If your team has bad results and is supposed to be bad (2022 Cubs), expectations are calibrated and it's easy to appreciate the season for what it is, invest in the prospects, etc. If your team has bad results and is supposed to be good (2019 Cubs), that's a tough one, but the experience is accessible and explicable. You have an identity! You have a right to be MAD (BULLPEN! MANAGER! INJURIES!)!

This season, after some high highs followed by some low lows, it's averaging out to a mid-talent level Cubs performing like a mid-level team. Which is frustrating. Inexplicably frustrating. They're close to being good, but not close enough to matter. And that's correct. And I'm finding myself having a hard time enjoying it at all, really.

How would you enjoy a season where a meh team, projected to just miss the playoffs, is performing exactly at expectations and will likely just miss the playoffs?

I was not expecting how hard this part of the answer would come for me!

The second approach is tougher. It does not come easily. But it's to accept the sadness, the boredom, the frustration, without judging those feelings. I'm not saying you should try to spin those into good emotions, the way you say you're able to in the hypothetical bad/bad and good/bad seasons; or even ignore them by shutting the team out of your mind. I mean that you can't outrun every hard emotion or bad expectation. When they come, it can be best to simply observe those emotions, be curious about them, know that they are temporary, let them be real. In fact, here’s the A3 advice box in today's New York Times, responding to you, personally!

People fare better when they accept their unpleasant emotions as appropriate and healthy, rather than trying to suppress them. When we perceive our emotions as bad, we pile more bad feelings onto our existing ones, which makes us feel worse. It's likely to increase the intensity of our negative feelings and the amount of time we suffer from them.

What I’m really saying is give yourself a break from the wanting; be sad without wanting to be not sad. Let your want muscles lie fallow for a season, and accept all of life.

I was just thinking this morning that I am trying to keep feeling my feelings but it's hard because I'm just sad all the time lately!

It's been a sad week.

Somehow it was only Monday, this week that I couldn't go see Elliot Page?

And the plans that didn't happen Tuesday night are what I'm missing today, because both D and I couldn't be away so long when one of us has to pin Gary down for his eyedrops (I've done it all five times today, and after he bit me on time #3 (only superficially but the adrenaline crash hit me hard and I was tearing up a lot recently even before that...), he has been very reactive ever since. Including as I update this at 1:30am, not having slept yet for this reason.

And as happy as I was to stay home with the puppy and not go to a movie I hate at the cinema on Wednesday, it is difficult not to feel after a while like fun things are for everyone but me! I didn't even listen to the Doof this week and that's an at-home activity! But I wasn't feeling it after my long day in London.

And next week...a friend asked me how my Thursday was looking and I just laughed bitterly: I knew she'd want a favor and I have a GP appointment for me and a vet appointment for Gary before I even start work, and a meeting for the thing I volunteer for after work...separate from the other meeting relating to that volunteering which I have on Monday night, sandwiched between work and D&D...and our D&D group meets virtually so that's 13 or so hours at the computer altogether.

A busy week is no guarantee of a nice weekend. A weekend sandwiched between two busy weeks no moreso. I was looking forward to seeing a friend tomorrow for a late celebration of her birthday, but I got my days wrong: she'd meant today, which would've been fine, but she wasn't well enough today. And that was it for my plans! It's hard to contemplate going on to another demanding week without some more nice things in between.

Profile

the cosmolinguist

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 67 8 9 10
11 12 13 1415 1617
1819 2021 22 2324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
OSZAR »